![]() Provides that when two or more actions requesting the same certification of a class are filed in two or more Louisiana courts regarding the same transaction or occurrence at the same location, and such classes would encompass one or more of the same plaintiffs suing in the same capacities against the same defendants, the defendant may have all such actions transferred to the district court where the event occurred. Makes certain changes as it relates to third party audits of unclaimed property. Provides for mandatory disclosure of third party litigation financing. Lowers the interest rate on untimely payment of insurance claims from 12 percent to 7 percent. Changes the statute of repose for actions that result from deficiency or defect in an improvement to real property. Reduces the statute of limitations for a number of causes of action including fraud, action for injury to character or other rights, and limitation when no other limitation is provided. Provides for limitations on discovery methods unless otherwise stipulated by the court. Provides for automatic stay of discovery upon the filing of a motion to dismiss. Adds new language to the general scope of discovery by specifically providing that parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to the party’s claim or defense and is proportional to the needs of the case, considering: importance of the issues at stake in the action amount in controversy parties’ relative access to relevant information parties’ resources importance of the discovery in resolving the issues and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Provides that a court, when ruling on a motion for a protective order, may order that discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including the allocation of expenses. Provides that, upon a motion of a party, a court shall limit the frequency or extent of discovery if it determines that one of the following applies: the discovery sought is cumulative or duplicative, or can be obtained from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit or is not proportional to the claims or defenses at issue considering the needs of the case, the amount in controversy, the parties’ resources, the complexity and importance of the issues at stake in the action, and the importance of discovery in resolving the issues. Specifies that, absent a showing by the moving party of substantial need and good cause (subject to an assessment of whether the burden of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit), a party is not required to provide discovery of four categories of electronically stored information (ESI) as outlined in the legislation. Provides that any party has a nondiscretionary right to interlocutory appeal of class certification. The personal injury bar’s argument against the interlocutory appeal of class action certification orders - that such orders are appealable at the end of a case - fails to take into account the strong incentive that defendants have to settle an unmeritorious case once the class is certified in order to save unnecessary litigation costs. The personal injury bar’s argument against meaningful class action certification standards - that flexible standards make the process more efficient by incorporating all like claims, and more fair by ensuring representation for plaintiffs with claims that would not otherwise be profitable for attorneys - fails to address the hardship imposed by abuse of the device on class members, (who receive pennies, while their lawyers receive millions), defendants, (who are often forced to settle unmeritorious lawsuits), and consumers, (who ultimately bear the burden of class actions through increased costs). ![]() ![]() April 2020 Press Release “Covid Class Actions Surge – 90% Receive No Benefit”.April 2020 Op-Ed “Class Action Conundrum”.ATRA also supports legislation that allows the interlocutory (immediate) appeal of class action certification orders. ![]() ATRA supports state legislation that allows only plaintiffs from the forum state who have suffered the same injury with similar claims against similar defendants to be certified as a class. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |